Quantcast
Channel: Question and Answer » astrophotography
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 44

Night Sky SuperResolution (instead of star trails) – possible?

$
0
0

I don’t know if this is possible, or runs into fundamental limits of sensors and photo sharpness.

I want to “pretend” that I have a fancy night sky motorized rig – through software.

  1. Take a few thousand 5-second exposure nigh sky pictures with a wide angle consumer camera (laying perfectly still)
  2. Align the images AND correct for lens distortion.
  3. Apply Superresolution to stack the aligned images.
  4. Profit!

I’ve had great success making star trails using StarStackX – no problem – but that was a straight stack-and-blend with no alignment.

I can also extract the location of the various star trails using some very brain-dead math and lots of laptop CPU time. Which feels like it should be enough to do a pretty good model of the lens distortion + atmosphere distortion… or maybe no “model”, and instead a straight transform.

Hugin and PTGui looked promising, but barfs on the number of control points I’m feeding to it.

ALTERNATIVELY – it may be impossible. If you imagine inverting the system, it would be like putting a cheap camera on a slow motorized mount, letting it take 3,000 nearly completely overlapping photos of a landscape, and then telling it “make one huge high-resolution panorama”… which AFAIK would be nearly impossible to do. I could align the photos, but I’m unaware of any stitching software that outputs significantly improved superresolution results. I’m hoping the nearly point-like light sources of stars isn’t quite as hard.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 44

Trending Articles